000			02821nam a2200433 a 4500
001			EBC775152
003			MiAaPQ
005			20240120132833.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			110308s2011 enk sb 001 0 eng d
010			_z 2011009193
020			_z9780521460002 (hbk.)
020			_z052146000X (hbk.)
020			_z9780521738293 (pbk.)
020			_z0521738296 (pbk.)
020			_a9781139114486 (electronic bk.)
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC775152
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL775152
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr10502662
035			_a(CaONFJC)MIL329836
035			_a(OCoLC)769341846
040			_aMiAaPQ _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ
050		4	_aK230.W475 _bA36 2011
100	1		_aWest, Robin, _d1954-
245	1	0	_aNormative jurisprudence _h[electronic resource] : _ban introduction / _cRobin West.
260			_aCambridge ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011.
300			_aix, 209 p.
490	1		_aCambridge introductions to philosophy and law
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aIntroduction : toward normative jurisprudence -- Revitalizing natural law -- Legal positivism, censorial jurisprudence, and legal reform -- Critical legal studies : the missing years -- Conclusion : reconstructing normative jurisprudence.
520			_a"Normative Jurisprudence aims to reinvigorate normative legal scholarship that both criticizes positive law and suggests reforms for it, on the basis of stated moral values and legalistic ideals. It looks sequentially and in detail at the three major traditions in jurisprudence - natural law, legal positivism, and critical legal studies - that have in the past provided philosophical foundations for just such normative scholarship. Over the last fifty years or so, all of these traditions, although for different reasons, have taken a number of different turns - toward empirical analysis, conceptual analysis, or Foucaultian critique - and away from straightforward normative criticism. As a result, normative legal scholarship - scholarship that is aimed at criticism and reform - is now lacking a foundation in jurisprudential thought. The book criticizes those developments and suggests a return, albeit with different and in many ways larger challenges, to this traditional understanding of the purpose of legal scholarship"-- _cProvided by publisher.
533			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
650		0	_aJurisprudence.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
710	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
830		0	_aCambridge introductions to philosophy and law.
856	4	0	_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bacm-ebooks/detail.action?docID=775152 _zClick to View
999			_c69418 _d69418