000			04258nam a2200481 a 4500
001			EBC743162
003			MiAaPQ
005			20240120132737.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			070508s2006 enk sb 001 0deng d
010			_z 2007295230
020			_z0567044742 (hbk. : alk. paper)
020			_z9780567044747
020			_a9780567109873 (electronic bk.)
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC743162
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL743162
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr10490300
035			_a(CaONFJC)MIL319253
035			_a(OCoLC)893335943
040			_aMiAaPQ _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ
050		4	_aBS2555.52 _b.S65 2006
082	0	4	_a226.06 _222
100	1		_aSmith, Daniel Alan, _d1963-
245	1	4	_aThe post-mortem vindication of Jesus in the sayings Gospel Q _h[electronic resource] / _cDaniel A. Smith.
260			_aLondon ; _aNew York : _bT&T Clark, _cc2006.
300			_axiii, 206 p.
490	1		_aLibrary of New Testament studies ; _v338
490	1		_aT & T Clark library of biblical studies
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
505	0		_aThe death and resurrection of Jesus in Q? -- Q 13.34-35, the Jerusalem lament : survey of research -- Assumption in antiquity -- The death and Assumption of Jesus in Q 13.34-35 -- The significance of Assumption in Q 13.34-35 for other Q materials -- The assumption of Jesus in Q and early Christianity -- Conclusion : Resurrection and/or Assumption : how different is Q?
520	3		_aThe Sayings Gospel Q, which is conspicuously silent on the issues of Jesus' death and resurrection, nonetheless shows evidence of a knowledge of Jesus' death and of a strategy for accounting for Jesus' vindication. The dissertation argues that Q thinks of Jesus' end as an assumption, a bodily removal from earth to heaven, as happened to figures such as Enoch and Elijah in Jewish tradition. Q 13:34-35, the Jerusalem Lament (Matt 23:37-39 par. Luke 13:34-35), is the central text examined. In this saying, Jesus predicts that "You will not see me until you say, 'Blessed is the Coming One in the name of the Lord'" (Q 13:35b). The language of "not seeing" or disappearance was a consistent feature in Hellenistic assumption narratives, and in Jewish tradition a special eschatological function was typically accorded to those taken away by God in this way. The connection between assumption and eschatological function is seen in Q not only in the reference to the "Coming One" in Q 13:35 (a citation of Ps 118:26), but also in the redactional connections made by Q between materials dealing with an absent master and a suddenly returning Son of man (Q 12:39-40, 12:42b-46; Q 17 'passim' and Q 19). Since Q apparently knows about Jesus' death; yet contains no hint of resurrection theology, the possibility arises that assumption, not resurrection, was how the Q people understood Jesus' vindication by God after his death. The thesis evaluates scholarship on related issues, the death of Jesus in Q and the possibility of an "Easter faith" in Q (Chapter One), and discusses the most significant contributions to the understanding of the Jerusalem Lament as a piece of Q material (Chapter Two). Chapter Three surveys assumption theology in Greco-Roman, Jewish, and early Christian sources. Chapter Four discusses in detail the presence of assumption theology in Q 13:34-35, and Chapter Five investigates the implications of the central thesis for Q as a whole. Finally, other early Christian texts which might betray a similar perspective on Jesus' post-mortem vindication are discussed (Chapter Six).
533			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
600	0	0	_aJesus Christ _xCrucifixion.
600	0	0	_aJesus Christ _xResurrection.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pN.T. _pGospels _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
650		0	_aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)
655		4	_aElectronic books.
710	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
830		0	_aLibrary of New Testament studies ; _v338.
830		0	_aT & T Clark library of biblical studies.
856	4	0	_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bacm-ebooks/detail.action?docID=743162 _zClick to View
999			_c68097 _d68097