TY  - BOOK
AU  - Gless,Sabine
AU  - Richter,Thomas
TI  - Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?: A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules
T2  - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Series
SN  - 9783030125202
AV  - K7000-7720.22 
PY  - 2019///
CY  - Cham
PB  - Springer International Publishing AG
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Editors and Contributors -- Abbreviations -- Keywords -- 1 Introduction -- Abstract -- 1 Criminal Justice as a Barometer of Social Developments -- 2 Criminal Trials and Human Rights -- 3 Exclusionary Rules as Safeguards -- 4 Comparative Perspectives on Exclusionary Rules -- 5 Core Issues Surrounding the Effectiveness of Exclusionary Rules -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Comparative Perspectives -- 2 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Establishing Facts in Swiss Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Balancing Fact-Finding and Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing the Facts, Procedural Rules, and Stages -- 2.1.3 Establishing the Facts: Actors and Accountability -- 2.1.3.1 Primary Actors -- 2.1.3.2 Supervision of Judicial Authorities and Legal Remedies -- 2.1.3.3 Liability of the State and Legal Officials for Improper Compulsion in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.4 Establishing the Facts: Institutional Safeguards -- 2.2 Relevance of the Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Public Interest in Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presenting the "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding with Exclusionary Rules in Switzerland -- 3.1 Exclusionary Rules in Swiss Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1.1 Rationale -- 3.1.2 The CPC's System of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.3 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.1.4 Enforcement of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.2 Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence Following Improper Compulsory Techniques; 3.2.1 The Right Against Self-Incrimination and Improper Compulsory Measures -- 3.2.2 Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment -- 3.2.3 Institutional Bans on Torture and the Right to Remain Silent -- 3.2.4 Exclusionary Rules Applicable to Illegally Obtained Evidence -- 3.2.4.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.4.2 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.2.5 Admissibility of Fruit of Poisonous Tree in Cases of Torture and Improper Compulsory Techniques -- 3.2.5.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.5.2 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.2.6 The Effect of International Human Rights Law -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Reports, Legislative History -- 3 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Establishing Facts in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Law Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Other Individual Rights with Relevance for the Criminal Process -- 2.1.1.4 Law Balancing the Search for Evidence and Infringements of Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing Facts-Stages and Rules -- 2.1.3 Establishing Facts-Actors and Accountability -- 2.1.4 Establishing Facts-Institutional Safeguards -- 2.2 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presentation of "Facts" Respectively "Fact-Finding" And/Or "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 General Rules on Taking Evidence (Admissibility of Evidence) -- 3.1.1 Legal Framework; 3.1.1.1 Legal Framework for Taking Evidence and Admissibility of Evidence -- 3.1.1.2 Practice and Jurisprudence -- 3.1.1.3 Consequences of a Violation of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.2 Debate on Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.3 Institutional Arrangements Securing Individual Rights -- 3.2 Evidence Obtained by Torture -- 3.2.1 Definitions of Torture and Inhuman Treatment -- 3.2.2 Definition of Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.2.3 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence Obtained by Torture -- 3.2.3.1 Procedure -- 3.2.3.2 Exclusionary Rules in Public Debate -- 3.2.4 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Ban on Torture -- 3.2.5 Exclusion of Evidence and Other Remedies Following a Breach of the Ban on Torture -- 3.2.6 Admissibility of Indirect Evidence ("Fruits of the Poisonous Tree") in Cases of Torture -- 3.3 Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence-Cases of Undue Coercion -- 3.3.1 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Right to Remain Silent -- 3.3.2 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence Obtained in Violation of the Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.3.3 Remedies Following Violations of Exclusionary Rules -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- 4 Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fact-Finding Procedure: Stages, Rules, and Actors -- 2.1 Stages and Rules -- 2.2 Actors and Accountability -- 3 General Framework for Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 Law Relating to the Search for Truth -- 3.2 Law Protecting Individual Rights -- 3.3 Law Balancing the Search for Truth and Individual Rights Protections -- 3.4 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 3.4.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth; 3.4.2 Presentation of Factfinding to the Public -- 3.4.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 4 Constitutional Limitations on the Admissibility of Confessions in Criminal Proceedings -- 4.1 Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Limits on Admissibility of Confessions -- 4.2 Sixth Amendment Limits on Admissibility of Confessions -- 4.3 The Miranda Safeguards Against Coerced Confessions -- 4.4 Exclusion of Evidence Obtained by Torture or Undue Coercion -- 4.5 Debate on Exclusionary Rules -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Reports, Legislative History -- 5 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Establishing Facts in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Laws Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Laws Balancing the Search for the Truth and Infringements of Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing Facts-Stages and Rules -- 2.1.3 Establishing Facts-Actors and Accountability -- 2.2 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presentation of "Facts", "Fact-Finding" and/or "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 General Rules of Evidence Taking (Admissibility of Evidence) -- 3.1.1 Specific Exclusionary Rules of the CCP -- 3.1.1.1 Confessions Collected During Specific Periods of Time Mandated by Law or at Night (Art. 158-2 Para. 1 of the CCP) -- 3.1.1.2 Right to Remain Silent and Access to a Defense Attorney (Art. 158-2 Para. 2 of the CCP); 3.1.2 Specific Exclusionary Rules of the Communication Security and Surveillance Act -- 3.1.3 General Exclusionary Rules of the CCP -- 3.2 Exclusion of Evidence Obtained by Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.1 Definitions of Torture, Undue Coercion and Degrading Punishment -- 3.2.2 Definitions of Right to Remain Silent/Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.2.3 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence (Possibly) Obtained by Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.3.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.3.2 Practice -- (High Court) Jurisprudence -- Protecting Human Dignity of the Defendant and His Status as a Party -- Safeguarding the Liberty of Decision Making and Mental Activities of the Defendant -- Deterrence from Illegal Investigatory Activity Based on the Principle of the Due Process of Law -- 3.2.4 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Ban on Torture Undue Coercion -- 3.2.5 Exclusion of Evidence or Other Remedies Following a Breach of the Ban on Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.6 Admissibility of Indirect Evidence ("Fruits of Poisonous Tree") in Cases of Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.6.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.6.2 Practice -- (High Court) Jurisprudence -- 3.2.7 Effect of International Human Rights -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- Sec38 -- References -- 6 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining a Duty to Search for the Truth -- 2.1.1.2 Law Securing a Fair Trial and/or Individual Rights -- Constitutional Rules -- Statutory Rules -- International Human Rights Law -- 2.1.1.3 Law Balancing a Duty to Determine the Truth and Infringements on Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Fact-Finding Procedure-Stages and Rules; 2.1.3 Fact-Finding Procedure-Actors and Accountability
UR  - https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bacm-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5754876
ER  -