Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing.

Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Contents -- About the Authors -- 1 Comparative Analysis of Policy Developments -- 1 Introduction -- 2 India -- 2.1 Overview of the Indian Patent System -- 2.2 Indian Law and Licensing -- 2.3 National IPR Policy -- 2.4 India's Digital Initiatives -- 2.5 DIPP Consultation Paper -- 2.6 The TRAI Consultation Paper and the Recommendation Papers -- 2.7 The National Digital Communications Policy -- 3 European Union -- 3.1 Overview of European Patent System -- 3.2 EU and Standardization -- 3.3 Public Consultation on Patent and Standards -- 3.4 Setting Out the EU Approach to SEPs -- 3.5 Standard Essential Patents and the Internet of Things: In-Depth Analysis, European Union -- 3.6 Guidelines on the Handling of the Antitrust Compulsory License Objection According to Huawei v. ZTE Within the Munich Procedure of Handling Patent Infringement Cases -- 3.7 EU Communication Making the Most of the EU's Innovative Potential an Intellectual Property Action Plan to Support the EU's Recovery and Resilience -- 3.8 EU Studies -- 4 United States of America (USA) -- 4.1 Overview of US Patent System -- 4.2 USA-Competition Enforcers and Licensing -- 4.3 The 2017 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property -- 4.4 The New Madison Approach -- 4.5 Policy Statement of Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments -- 4.6 Business Review Letters (BRL) -- 5 China -- 5.1 Overview of Chinese IP System -- 5.2 Standard Setting in China -- 5.3 Framework for Injunctions -- 5.4 Beijing Guidelines, 2017 -- 5.5 Guangdong Guidelines, 2018 -- 5.6 The Chinese Antimonopoly Law and SEPs -- 6 Japan -- 6.1 A Brief Overview of Japan's Patent System -- 6.2 Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Japanese Antimonopoly Act -- 6.3 Recent Technical Studies on IP and SEPs in Japan.

6.4 Guide to Licensing Negotiations Involving SEPs -- 6.5 Guidelines on the 'Fair Value Calculation of SEP for Multi-component Products' -- 2 SSOs' Role in Facilitating IP Policy Measures -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Why Do We Need a Standard? -- 3 Standard Setting Organizations -- 4 Importance of SSOs in Setting Essential Patents -- 4.1 Standard Setting Process in SSOs -- 4.2 Advantages and Risk of Standard Setting by SSOs -- 4.3 IPR Policies of SSOs: Understanding Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents -- 5 Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents -- 5.1 Disclosure and Licensing Requirements ETSI -- 5.2 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement of TSDSI -- 5.3 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement IEEE -- 6 FRAND Commitment and Injunction -- 3 Jurisprudence Evolved in Cases Involving Standard Essential Patents -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Disclosure Requirement -- 3 Non-disclosure at the Time of Standard Development -- 3.1 Non-disclosure Amounting to Equitable Doctrine of Implied Waiver -- 4 Injunctive Relief -- 4.1 Pre-Huawei Jurisprudence -- 4.2 Huawei v ZTE -- 4.3 Post Huawei -- 5 Developments in India -- 6 Antisuit Injunction -- 7 Conclusion -- Annexure I: Membership Application Form for TSDSI -- Annexure II: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for TSDSI -- Annexure III: IPR Information Statement and Licensing Declaration for TSDSI -- Annexure IV: IPR Information Statement for TSDSI -- Annexure V: IPR Licensing Declaration for TSDSI -- Annexure VI: Application for ETSI Membership -- Annexure VII: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI -- Annexure VIII: Statement and Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI -- Annexure IX: ETSI - IPR Information Statement Annex -- Annexure X: Optional Written Explanation of Reasons for Not Making the IPR Licensing Declaration -- Annexure XI: Letter of Assurance for Essential Patent Claims for IEEE.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2023. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.